A woman is a mystery and trying to understand her is futile.woman not in his capacity as a man, but as a consciousness, an awareness.
To find her true potential, a woman should search within her own soul and rebel against any repression. Unless you have a rebellious soul, you are not alive in the true sense of the word.
A woman should not imitate man: Rejoice in her feminine qualities, make a poetry out of them. The perfect state of being is a synthesis between the head and the heart, with the heart remaining the master.“It is the long condemnation of feminine qualities that has gone deep into the blood and the bones of women. It is man’s conspiracy to prove himself superior to women — which he is not.And to prove that the woman is weak, he has to condemn all the feminine qualities. He has to say that they are all weak, and all those qualities together make the woman weak. In fact, the woman has all the great qualities in her. And whenever a man becomes awakened, he attains to the same qualities which he has been condemning in women. The qualities that are thought to be weak are all the feminine qualities. And it is a strange fact that all the great qualities come into that category. What is left are only the brutal qualities, animal qualities.Love, trust, beauty, sincerity, truthfulness, authenticity — these are all feminine qualities, and they are far greater than any qualities that man has. But the whole past has been dominated by man and his qualities”.
“To acquire some feminine qualities.... And just see, all qualities are feminine: love, compassion, sympathy, service, sharing — all qualities are feminine. Even if a man wants to function at the highest peak of his intelligence, he will have to be guided by his heart”.All above ; She creates another life in her womb. Who can be more artistic and creative than her....its a woman only who carries another soul within her when she gets pregnant...
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Let Science Become More Creative
Let Science Become More Creative
Human being has been trying experiments since a long timeHe has tried religion and it has failed.He has tried politics and it has failed.Now we have to try science. Give it a chance, because in three hundred years it has made more progress than man has made in his whole history of hundreds of thousands of years.
Science has grown to such complexity that it is not possible for individual scientists to work on their own. They need immense support from politicians. Their research projects are so expensive that only governments of very rich nations can afford them. So the scientist unknowingly has fallen a victim in the hands of the politicians.
Now he works as a servant to nationalism, to communism, to fascism, to capitalism — he is no more an independent seeker, he is part of a certain political ideology. He works and discovers but he has no control over his own discoveries. The control is in the hands of the politicians. They decide in which direction he should work; otherwise they will not financially support his project.This can be changed only if two things are added to science: one is that it should not only be an objective search, it should also open the subjective doors of consciousness. The scientist should not go on working only on objects — he has to work upon the scientist himself.
Up to now he has been denying his own consciousness. It is such an absurd attitude, so illogical and so unscientific, that it brings scientists closer to the superstitious, so-called religions. They believe blindly in a God they know nothing about, and the scientist goes on disbelieving in himself. The superstition is enormous, unbelievable. If there is nobody inside you, if there is no consciousness in you, then who is going to discover the mysteries and secrets of matter, nature, and life? Up to this point, science has been behaving in an old superstitious way. It has been imitating religion.
Unless science opens up the dimension of one’s own interiority, it will not become a total subject, a whole subject; it will remain partial, its viewpoint will remain only half of the truth.
Science will become of tremendous importance if it adds subjectivity, if it adds methods of meditation to the methods of concentration.
The methods of concentration take you out, they are extrovert. Science requires a mind which has the capacity to concentrate. Meditation requires the capacity to go beyond mind, to go into silence, to be absolutely a pure nothingness.
Unless science accepts meditation as a valid method of inquiry, it will remain a half-hearted search; and because of its half-heartedness, it is dangerous. It can easily serve the purposes of death — because it does not believe in consciousness, it believes in dead matter. So it does not matter whether Nagasaki happens or Hiroshima happens, or even if the whole globe commits suicide. It doesn’t matter, because all is matter — there is no consciousness. Nothing is lost.
The scientist will revolt against the politicians only when the dimension of meditation is added in his research, to his work.
Secondly, the scientist has to remember now that he is providing the politicians with self-destructive nuclear weapons. He is behaving against humanity, he is behaving against the new man, the new humanity. He is behaving against his own children. He is sowing seeds of death for all.
It is time that scientists should learn to discriminate between what helps life and what destroys life. Just because of their salaries and comforts they should not go on like slaves and robots, working for war and a destruction which is unprecedented.
The scientist has to become a revolutionary too. He has to be a spiritual seeker first, and second he has to be a revolutionary.
Human being has been trying experiments since a long timeHe has tried religion and it has failed.He has tried politics and it has failed.Now we have to try science. Give it a chance, because in three hundred years it has made more progress than man has made in his whole history of hundreds of thousands of years.
Science has grown to such complexity that it is not possible for individual scientists to work on their own. They need immense support from politicians. Their research projects are so expensive that only governments of very rich nations can afford them. So the scientist unknowingly has fallen a victim in the hands of the politicians.
Now he works as a servant to nationalism, to communism, to fascism, to capitalism — he is no more an independent seeker, he is part of a certain political ideology. He works and discovers but he has no control over his own discoveries. The control is in the hands of the politicians. They decide in which direction he should work; otherwise they will not financially support his project.This can be changed only if two things are added to science: one is that it should not only be an objective search, it should also open the subjective doors of consciousness. The scientist should not go on working only on objects — he has to work upon the scientist himself.
Up to now he has been denying his own consciousness. It is such an absurd attitude, so illogical and so unscientific, that it brings scientists closer to the superstitious, so-called religions. They believe blindly in a God they know nothing about, and the scientist goes on disbelieving in himself. The superstition is enormous, unbelievable. If there is nobody inside you, if there is no consciousness in you, then who is going to discover the mysteries and secrets of matter, nature, and life? Up to this point, science has been behaving in an old superstitious way. It has been imitating religion.
Unless science opens up the dimension of one’s own interiority, it will not become a total subject, a whole subject; it will remain partial, its viewpoint will remain only half of the truth.
Science will become of tremendous importance if it adds subjectivity, if it adds methods of meditation to the methods of concentration.
The methods of concentration take you out, they are extrovert. Science requires a mind which has the capacity to concentrate. Meditation requires the capacity to go beyond mind, to go into silence, to be absolutely a pure nothingness.
Unless science accepts meditation as a valid method of inquiry, it will remain a half-hearted search; and because of its half-heartedness, it is dangerous. It can easily serve the purposes of death — because it does not believe in consciousness, it believes in dead matter. So it does not matter whether Nagasaki happens or Hiroshima happens, or even if the whole globe commits suicide. It doesn’t matter, because all is matter — there is no consciousness. Nothing is lost.
The scientist will revolt against the politicians only when the dimension of meditation is added in his research, to his work.
Secondly, the scientist has to remember now that he is providing the politicians with self-destructive nuclear weapons. He is behaving against humanity, he is behaving against the new man, the new humanity. He is behaving against his own children. He is sowing seeds of death for all.
It is time that scientists should learn to discriminate between what helps life and what destroys life. Just because of their salaries and comforts they should not go on like slaves and robots, working for war and a destruction which is unprecedented.
The scientist has to become a revolutionary too. He has to be a spiritual seeker first, and second he has to be a revolutionary.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)